the history of some monsters

To finish out my treatise on favorite horror stories I wanted to talk about the possible reasons for these thoughts and ideas having come up in the first place. Zombies are actually a religious expression from the voodoo religion. They would drug people and put them into trances and those people would have exhibited all the tendencies of a dead man. So that is actually a normal idea. The original zombies however would not have more than a passing resemblance to current ones. They were hypnotized or drugged people who were under the control of, often unscrupulous, voodoo practitioners. Vampires and werewolves were an attempt to figure out the vagaries of human kind and they also might have had something to do with the deficiencies in medical knowledge of the day. There were times when people were buried before they were REALLY dead. As miracle max put it they were only mostly dead. Sometimes peoples bodies were misdiagnosed as being dead. In fact a lot of our tradition today comes from that fact. The viewing of the body, the Irish wake these are reflections of those times. Also many of our phrases come from that time too. Like graveyard shift, or saved by the bell. The graveyard shift, and saved by the bell both come from how people were sometimes buried alive. At some point people realized that people were not always dead when they went into that hole. In order to make sure only the dead were truly buried they would leave a hole in the coffin top and tie a string to the finger of the body. After tying that to a bell above ground, if the body moved the bell would ring and so they could be saved by the ringing of that little bell. But in order to hear it sometimes you had to have someone on duty late at night in the graveyard to listen for that bell. Thus graveyard shift. By the way, Ghouls were people who would dig up corpses for the money they might be able to get from stealing from the bodies. Hmm maybe that was how they found out that some of the dead weren’t really dead when they were buried… Anyway now you know… if you want to know more there is lots of research out there to look into.

A series on monsters 3

Werewolves among us? Today’s installment in the horror theme thing is werewolves. A man is bitten by a wild creature, then on the next full moon he finds out that his razor is just not doing the job anymore. Spooky. What can we use against werewolves in our defense? Wolfsbane (good luck tracking that down) or silver bullets. (in this economy???) But they are stopable. So what makes them so scary? Well like both our predecessors in this series the first creep out is that they can turn you into them. The second is the lack of control, unless you get some REALLY thick curtains you will always have to be worried about that sneaky moon. You will be following that sucker more than a UFO nut. Again it would appear that werewolves have a really good PR guy. They are certainly gaining popularity. Still they are supposed to be scary. I think the thing that most makes them scary is that they could be ANYONE. It could be your best friend or your mom or dad or even, in some scenarios, you yourself. Think about that if you will. Still if you are a werewolf this is not the end of the world. I mean, after all, on the positive list you have, being a were wolf means you will not have to worry about balding. Unlike vampires you can still enjoy a nice Italian bistro, and there will be periods of time when you can relax knowing that at least for this one night of the month you will NOT be a bloodthirsty hairy monster. So enjoy this Halloween and try not to eat any of the trick or treaters.

A series on monsters 2

Ok so October has arrived and been here for a while. With this month we will start seeing more horror movies airing on t.v. we will see witches hats and vampire fangs on the shelves in our stores and we will soon see all the little goblins and ghouls roaming our streets looking for sweet treats. SO I want to start looking at the logic of our favorite horror figures For example tonight I want to talk about zombies. Do they make any sense? Honestly I have seen a lot of takes on what a zombie is and what creates them or motivates them. I have read books and watched movies and listened to the stories. I am NOT going to get into the history of the zombie “legend” here, I may save that for another blog later. But I do want to see how viable they are. First almost all the stories/legends/myths focus on the apparent motivation. The motivation is the main point to the whole Zombie Genre… What makes the zombie scary? Is it fast? No not usually. Is it smart? Nope, not too much intelligence. Maybe it is because they are sneaky? No… they are pretty straightforward. The thing that makes them scariest is because they keep coming and coming. They don’t stop! And then, the crowning touch, the piece de resistance, They turn you into one of them! But is that what motivates them? They want to make more zombies? No their motivation seems to be simple hunger. We all can understand that. But what do they eat? Brains. Any brains? No, human brains. And that is all there is to it. Next aspect… How do zombies usually make new zombies? Their bite can turn a person from human to zombie. So how do we stop the zombie? Shoot it in the head. Destroy the brain. Well wait a minute here!!!! If the food the zombie wants is your brain where is it going to go for when it attacks you? They go for the head, the brains. But if the new buffet has no brains then how does it turn into one of the undead? It can’t. so logically zombies are impossible or at least so extremely inefficient that they are really not that scary. So as you go out there for your little thrills and scares do not worry about that pasty weirdo coming after you with the skin rotting off his body. It is probably just someone who really wants your tootsie roll stash. Then again maybe the stories have gotten it all wrong and they are coming out there… No no just kidding.

A series on monsters

Vampire time. Well today I want to continue what I started in my last blog with a break down of our favorite horror stories. Tonight it is the old standby, Vampires! Now these guys are a little more believable than our prior subject. They are simply after blood. They do not resort in wholesale harvesting of their victims like zombies do, they can turn you into one of them but there is control. And they are smart. Most of the time your modern vampire could be portrayed as stylish, suave even sophisticated. While the current trend is to make them more inviting and desirable, they are a very strong staple of the horror genre from time immemorial. The original vampires were NOT handsome pale heart breakers. If you watch the old time Black and White “Nosferatu” you will see a misshapen wretch who had a power of hypnosis over his (it’s ?) victims. To me this one is far more believable because it has more weaknesses. But also because of how it has been treated by popular culture. I mean think about it. Here is a creature that started out despised and truly horrible and now it has become something to be lusted after. I mean that really sounds to me like a VERY good P.R. job on the part of the coalition of vampires. First they went from misshapen things, to suave debonair gentlemen of the night. Then from there to desirable young men (and women) to the current idea of them being a preferred “mate” for real human beings. Sounds like about the best P.R. job in the entire history of earth. I guess that means we better all stock up on Holy water, garlic and wooden stakes. Of course there is no real evidence that vampires are real. But maybe you better be prepared

Are security officers really the issue?

o.k. so I was on a social website for professionals, in there I was looking at a site where they were talking about the lack of professionalism of security guards. One of the big questions was whether this lack extended all the way throughout the industry or if it was only limited to certain areas. Now I have a bit of experience in this area and I got to thinking, the real problem is that you expect them to act professional, but you refuse to treat them like they were professionals. You call them names, you pay them poor wages, you refuse to give them the training or tools they need to do their job, you work them like you would work no other employee and then you demand them to be professional as well. That is why a lot of people who MIGHT have been great assets who have considered being in the industry aren’t. These things are why there is a high turnover rate and this is why you can only get people to work for you that are less than the best or at least less motivated than most. Think about it! What kind of conditions do the security officers, that you know, work in? I know of one job near me where the security officer sits in a “Room” up to 12 hours a day. The room is little more than a closet measuring about 6 feet by 4 feet. The walls are all painted a dirty yellow and the only items in there are a radio clock, a grey institutional desk and a camera monitor that is hooked to cameras that do not actually work. The standards of operation dictate when to turn the monitor on and off, and even though the monitor has NO use whatsoever the officer is still expected to follow those procedures. The officer is tasked with preventing any trespassers but at the same time the company insists that certain doors to the outside not only must remain unlocked but they have to be propped open to allow air flow through the building to keep people from suffering heatstroke or worse. And ALL those doors are outside of the view of the officer in his room. Sometimes the officer is required to maintain the premises and the machinery of the business when other employees are unavailable basically then doing the job of those other employees AND his own job simultaneously while still getting paid little more than minimum wage. Right down the hall from his room is a bulletin board where the company lists the starting wages and positions that are open in the company. Every wage on that list is higher than anything the officer can look forward to but because he is contracted with the business and not a direct employee he is ineligible for any of those positions. So he is stuck in a job that pays 10 cents over minimum wage even though he has already proven that he CAN do any of the jobs at the business, because he DOES do ALL of the jobs, simultaneously, whenever the regulars are gone.) All of that and yet when the business cannot seem to keep any regular officers on the post they complain that “no one wants to earn their paychecks anymore.” I kid you not this was actually said to me one day as someone in the business offices was complaining about the lack of decent help. I told her to consider all the information I just presented here but she refused to hear it. There is no respect for the officers there, only spite. So maybe now I can ask you, if those are the conditions that a security officer faces, What do you think the answer is to the question about the lack of professionalism of security guards?

Family time

Wow school is almost back for us and I was just thinking how short time can be. My little baby, who to me was born just a little while ago, is going into third grade. THIRD GRADE!!! What the heck happened??? She isn’t old enough for that! Sadly she is. Her little sister is going into first and we are trying to figure out what we will be doing for preschool for her other little sister in just a short time. I mean, next year they will all be going to a school. How does this happen? I think that what needs to happen here is when a man becomes a dad or a woman a mom they ought to be allowed, even paid to stay at home with their families. Until they can get the kids to the point where they are out of the house, the job of the parents ought to be simply to raise their kids. There should not be any point where the parents are going to have to look back and say “how did I miss those moments?” At least that is the way it ought to work, I think. Think of all the things that kids do these days. Cheerleading, Christmas plays and concerts, Little league, AYSO, Scouting (boy or girl) Church events, Art shows, Piano recitals, ballet, … the list is huge! So many things that a parent can miss. So there you go. My solution to these problems in a nutshell. Pay the parents to be there for their kids. To share in the memories and the joys. The triumphs and the losses. To kiss every scrape and cheer every smile. AND maybe if we did that there would be stronger families making happier kids and giving us all a brighter future.

What I would like to see in MP3’S.

I have been moving out of the dark ages of music slowly and there is one point I would like to make about WHY it is taking so long for me to do this. When I was a boy we got our music out of the magic box that spoke to us about the weather and played songs. There were many of these magic boxes all over the place. They were called radios. They were in cars and homes and businesses and all over the place. They brought an interesting world to our attention. One that we could not really experience in any other way. But we were somewhat subjected to their whims. Oh sure if I wanted to listen to a certain genre I could tune in a specific station that played that type of music otherwise you got what you got whether it was really what you wanted or not. Of course if there was a specific thing I wanted to listen to, say for example “Surfer Girl” by the Beach Boys or “Yesterday” by the Beatles then I could always turn to my trusty record player. The record player gave me choices that radio did not and it gave me a little bit of control over what I was listening to. Then there were Cassette Tapes. A magnificent invention which allowed me to take MY music wherever I went. Much more compact and useful. I would like to pause for a moment and point out that I got VERY good at both placing a needle in just the right groove to hear a song that I specifically liked and also at fast forwarding a cassette to the song that I wanted. But back to my original discussion. Briefly the recording industry realized that people wanted more ability to listen to what THEY wanted WHEN they wanted, thus the “8-track” was born. This gave even easier control over finding your song choice as well as allowing you to be able to listen to the same songs on a loop until you really got tired of it. This was also useful to D.J.s all over the world since they could get singles on an 8 track format and they never had to worry about rewinding the tape or anything. Sadly the 8-track never really got the chance to shine like it should have. For a couple of reasons… one, it was a niche type thing, a popular niche but a niche nonetheless. Two, it was bulkier than regular cassette tapes and thus limited the amount of music you could carry. OH and three, it was soon confronting a new technology, one which promised better fidelity and experience… the CD. WOW the CD… clear crisp sound over and over, no worries about proximity to magnets didn’t tear or break easily… often touted as “indestructible”. Of course we know better NOW still at the time in comparison to 8 tracks and cassettes it WAS a technically superior product. Of course one other point that went in it’s favor is the fact that, due to the laser coding of the disks the players for the cd’s could jump you straight to the exact song/s you wanted. They could also randomize the song/s, they could play them in a programmed order, you could really control the music the way you wanted. Enter the MP3. Selling point/s? (1) You can carry TONS of music all on a tiny device that fits easily in a pocket or your hand. (2) It sounds about as clear as a cd because it too is digitized. (3) You could find more individualized songs and set things up so that you weren’t stuck with just one type/genre. But here is where the problem comes in for me… Too many of these things are simply taking us back to the point where we had little to no control. I have had a few mp3s now. I think each of them had something that was good in them. But they don’t have ALL the things I want in one package. I started with a really cheap mp3 that actually let me program the order I wanted the songs in. it contained a lot of songs and it was great. The problem was it WAS cheap in the construction and did not last long before it pretty much broke. (not in software or whatever just in the case shattered.) I think one of the drawbacks there was that it was TOO small and thus too easily damaged. Of course then I got another that one was ok too. But there were a few issues there. This one didn’t let me categorize my music how I want. In fact it has a rather stubborn insistence that all the songs HAVE to be played in alphabetical sequence. There is no allowance in it for either MY wishes or the wishes of the makers of the music. In fact if loaded two different CDs (albums) onto the player it would have a fine disregard for all points except “which SONG comes first alphabetically?” However the MP3 also played video (AWESOME!!!) although it was small on the screen that was cool. It also will access FM radio so I get to listen still to other music as well and get news reports. Still I would have really liked to be able to listen to music in the order that I want not in the order that IT thinks is alphabetically superior. Well soon I will go onto a new player. I am unsure if this will be mine, or one that I give to my girls. The first mp3 I bought for my wife she immediately filled with lullabies and then “loaned” to the girls, talk about making me feel selfish. Her second mp3 she claims to be unable to make work the way she wants and for the most part she just listens to the radio now (full circle there huh?) although it does have features like the ability to do live recording so you could literally put what ever you want on it. So we will see, my next player has already been ordered and is on it’s way, I chose one that has a “Large screen” of 4 inches and hope that we may be able to use it to keep our youngest child occupied on an upcoming long trip. If it works well I may be allowing one of my girls to take over the old one, or I may let them have the new one… like I said, we will see. I hope that some day I will find the mp3 that is right for me. Until then…

Olympic time again.

I have to be honest. When I was much younger I didn't really care about the olympics...I didn't really care about ANY sport. (not even when I looked at the ultra mega totally cute gymnasts like Mary Lou Retton. I liked the girl but the sport just left me cold. Of course I was a couple of years younger than her but...) I blithely went around totally oblivious to the events in the sports world around me. Today is a little bit different. The 2012 Olympics started and I watched them. in fact I watched the last few Olympics but this is the first time I have felt obliged to Blog on them. Why might I pick this Olympics to blog? well simply because this one has meant more to me than any other yet. I have decided to skip the politics or the questions in this blog... maybe those will come later, today I want to talk about the reasons why I like the Olympics now and why I choose to blog now. I have found that there are some sports that I really do like to watch. I like Beach Volleyball, Archery, Soccer/Football and Women's Gymnastics. The last one I think is because I have daughters and there are times that I see their determination or youth on that mat in the girls who are competing. the reason why I chose to Blog this though is what happened a couple of nights ago with the women's Gymnastics. I watched the Russian team trying to compete and no one can deny it was an utter disaster for them. My heart went out to them and as I watched one girl doing her routine I saw my daughter's face on hers. the determination and afterwards the pain I saw was one that I could easily have seen on my child's face. I think that is what helped me realize why I was not a big sports person before either, I just don't come by the killer instinct naturally like that. I had to have it trained into me. To go ahead and mash your opponent into the ground after they have been handed an enormous blow like that... I am not sure I could have done it so easily. I DID see the value and need for the American team to succeed and to do their best. I also am aware that they needed to perform at their best for the audience as well as themselves. I know that if the American team had not done their best they would have cheated themselves, the audience, the rest of the Americans they represented and even the Russians a grave disservice. I feel fairly confident that if I had to go out and do my best even though my opponent had suffered so badly I would have been able to do so. Still My heart truly did go out to those girls. This isn't the first time And I think that is one of the points to the whole event. How many of us held our breath when the Jamaican bobsled team had that crash? how many of us jumped into the air screaming for joy when the American Hockey team won against all odd and against the Russians? How many of us cried when we saw Derek Redmond or Kerri Strug continue on even when they were so badly injured? All of these moments the ups and downs are part and parcel of why we get so hooked on these sports. Yeah I guess the American team could have gone easier on the Russians, but if they had that would not have been the Olympic spirit. Possibly worse than that we can see the effect this attitude has on our society today. there are a lot of people out there who could be better if our society would let them. Anyway. I think I will go ahead and enjoy the Olympics. I have a better understanding of the whole thing and of myself. And that makes it worthwhile. Oh I gotta go... Swimming is coming on.

Children and Marriage

In today’s culture I see a lot of problems. And frankly I do not know how to address them when talking with my children. The biggie that hit me most recently was about being faithful to your marriage vows. I know several people who have been less than faithful. And I see/hear the reports in the news. It seems to be the “In thing” to get a divorce today. Then we have groups of people saying they want to change the fundamental understanding of what marriage even is. So what is marriage then? Well I would say that it is what happens when two people love each other and want to stay together forming a family. But if everyone is getting divorced right and left then what hope is there for that ideal? What is love? In first Corinthians (chapter 13 verses 4-7ESV) Paul tells us… “Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast, it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on it’s own way’ it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things and endures all things”. The point here is that Love requires active work. We cannot think only of ourselves or our needs. We have to think of the other/s whom we profess to love. This is even truer in Marriage. For a good marriage to work BOTH sides have to come together to work at it side by side in the long haul. A lot of people get focused on the wedding and fail to think past that point. Now a wedding can be a very stressful event. And marriage can be stressful. I think that a wedding’s preparations are designed to be pretty stressful so that you can get the idea of how well you work together as a couple is stressful situations. The problem is that a wedding is designed with a goal in mind. A sprint if you will. A marriage however is a long-term deal. A marathon in comparison. The thing is that this marathon has no end in sight... I do not mean this to sound like it is a negative. But I would advise you to think about it. When you look at your beloved’s face can you wake up next to that daily for the rest of your life? What will you do when she gets cancer? Are you prepared to care for her? What will you do when he has a stroke? Are you prepared to do all the things for him that he can’t? This might include bathing him/her. Giving your loved one medicine/s cleaning up vomit or worse. Can you put his/her needs above your own? Even if it going to be for the next year? What if it is for the next 5 years or 15? Love isn’t just about feeling. Love is work! When he wants to watch Football, are you ok with that? Can you let him do that? Even though you want to go out to dinner? What about when she wants to go look at fabric and patterns at the fabric store. Can you go along and support her? Even if that means you have to give up the fishing trip? That is what love is. Putting their needs above your own. And it is not easy, BUT it IS worth it.

My Favorite season.

Today I want to talk about my favorite season. Now don’t get me wrong! Just because I have a favorite season, that does not mean that I do not enjoy the others. In fact I intend to outline the good things involved in ALL the seasons. But I do still have a favorite. Let me begin by talking about all the seasons. Let us start with the “beginning” of the cycle, Spring! A wonderful season with new life, new birth and rebirth. The trees get new buds, the flowers grow and bloom, the rain falls down blessing the earth, the animals start to come out and all the soft green and growth has a unique beauty that is never seen in any other month. The smells of spring are so fresh and clean. The freshly turned earth, the new flowers and all. It is a truly awesome time of the year. And the holidays involved! Easter with it’s jelly beans, Chocolate Bunnies, and marshmallow peeps. Or St Patricks day with all the “wearing ‘o’ the green” and fun. Or Valentines day with the protestations of love and the promise of future love. Baseball starts in the spring and the promise of what is to come is very palpable. It isn’t long until spring flows into summer, our second season to look at. This is a time of heat and play. There is work involved but it really seems almost a peripheral thing. We start to see the harvests come in and we also see more time to do things like go to the swimming pool or the watering hole or the creek or wherever and do all the water sports. Traditionally now it is a time of vacations and sports. School comes to a close and parks open. Baseball is now in full swing and is rapidly heading to the big Finish. We go to the theme parks and the lakes and we play. We get out in the sun and work on all the projects that have been waiting for our attention for so long. We go camping and we enjoy Children’s lemonade stands. There are Rodeos and Baseball games and fireworks and campouts and cookouts. For food/s we look at having grilled chicken, Burgers, Hot dogs, and Steaks. Fresh Corn on the cob and cold watermelon, Freshly churned Ice cream and snow cones. The Holidays include Memorial day, Mother’s day, Father’s Day and the Fourth of July. Truly a time of fun in the sun. But then there comes Fall. Our third season of consideration. The weather is cooling off. The trees start to change colors to the reds and golds that they have gone through before. The wildlife starts to slow down as they finish their work in preparation for the winter and they start going into hibernation. Football has started and we start to drink Apple cider and eating candy apples and popcorn balls. School is back in session, and the air takes on a new crispness. All the harvests are in, the canning and preserving is finishing up and we start to look forward to the next year and even the next season. We start to build (and smell) fires to keep us warm. There are harvest parties, hayrides, and a kind of restfulness. We have the holidays of Halloween and Thanksgiving. Raking of leaves and playing in them. This is a magical time of the year. Which leads to the final season. Winter! White and snow and Ice. A time to play in the snow; make snow angels and lick icicles. Snowmen start popping up and colored lights come out and trees move into our houses and a whole new music start ringing through the air. When we finish with our play we come in to enjoy hot cocoa, Candy canes ginger bread houses and freshly baked cookies. We look forward to the BIG event of winter, Christmas! With all the things that attend. The presents, the dinner with Turkey and Scalloped potatoes, Green bean casserole Sweet potatoes, Pecan and pumpkin pies and Eggnog! We sing carols, we go to plays and cantatas and parties. There is a new sense of magic and wonder as we watch the little ones gape and wonder at the lights and the presents wrapped in all the colors. There is a sense of bonhomie a general feeling of wanting to make life better for those in need. We hang stockings and we all feel an anticipation of good things to come. We feel linked to the past in ways that we never really feel through any of the other seasons as we read A Christmas Carol and watch A Christmas story. We think of the ways that Christmas has been celebrated for centuries. If we do not celebrate Christmas there is still something for us. The Menorahs and Kwanzaa candles glowing and adding their lights to the riot of colors and lights that adorn the houses where Christmas is celebrated. We get an up close picture of the joy that children feel, the magic that they sense and we try to keep that alive, for them and for us with tales of Christmases past and reading the stories that were written before in celebration of this time. We relive our happy memories of those days from before as we live vicariously through the kids, Or just through our own joy, through this time. So which one is my favorite? To be honest I love all the seasons to some extent many for the reasons listed above. My second favorite time is probably Winter. With all the food (and presents) of Winter, and the things linked with that, I find myself particularly enamored of the links to the past that fit in there, to think that some of these traditions have been practiced for centuries. It makes me feel linked to the past AND the future. But I think my favorite time is Fall. It is the best of them because it takes the best of Summer and Winter and puts those together with it’s own brand of style. There are smells that you will NEVER smell any other time. You start anticipating the fun (And presents) of winter and you find yourself linked to the past in a similar way as you might during the winter. And sometimes the anticipation is better than the actual event. There are still lots of outdoor sports, there is magic in the falling leaves and color changes and weather changes. There is anticipation for Halloween and Thanksgiving. You get the turkey dinner and the pumpkin pie and the scalloped potatoes and the Eggnog of winter. While still enjoying the warmer days of late summer where It is still warm enough for a few last grill outs. There is still corn on the cob and you can finish off the watermelon in the fridge or the ice creams and Popsicle’s that are still in the freezer. And yet this is THE time to enjoy Apple cider (cold and Hot) and Candy Apples. (you won’t find those in your stocking) and best of all, The bugs all go away! If you compare a year to a day Spring is sort of like when you wake up and you are still getting ready for the day Summer is the middle of the day where you are the busiest, working and playing hard, facing the heat while dealing with the chores. Winter is the late evening and night where you sleep and rest in preparation for the coming dawn. This is when you Dream and hope. But FALL! Fall is the early evening hours. When the fireflies come out, when you slow down and look back on the day and say “It was good!” When your dreams have all been met (or failed), when you rest and know that you worked hard and you can now enjoy the fruits of your labors. It is that drowsy between time where you are not really asleep but you are not really awake. When you are comfortable no longer tiring yourself out but you are tired enough that you feel happy. And that is why it is my favorite time of year.

Movies then and now

So lately I got to thinking. I was thinking about movies and the way they have evolved and the way that people have changed over the years. I thought about the fact that the language and subject/s we consider “O.K.” for kids consumption has changed. I mean the first Star Trek movie that came out in the 70’s was rated R when it came out. Today that exact same movie would get a rating no worse than PG. @0 years before that when They were making the movie “It’s a wonderful life.” The film makers (and MPAA) were struggling to make a movie that would be suitable for kids… in order to achieve that goal they had to take out the word/s (SHUT UP? STUPID? LOOK IT UP). These words were considered tame in the 70’s and in today’s society they are largely considered childish themselves. It seems that There are a lot of people today (indeed even in the late 70’s and 80’s) who seem to think that any movie that is labeled G has to be “made for kids”. (say that sentence with disgust or scorn and you got the idea behind that sentence.) The thing is that they do not have to be that way. I watched the movie “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate factory.” When I was a kid. As a kid I loved it. Watching it with my daughters does not bother me (certainly not the way the remake Charlie and the chocolate factory does.) but when I am watching Willy Wonka and seeing what Gene Wilder did as an adult I can tell you that this is definitely not a “kids only” movie. There is subtlety and context that completely goes over my kid’s heads. But it makes the movie even richer for me now than it did then. In order for me to appreciate those subtleties I had to mature and grow. In the 80’s an up and coming director included a rather risqué word in his new sci fi movie. He did this because he wanted to draw the kids who only wanted to see “cool grown up movies" who would have refused to see anything rated G. This attitude remains to this day. This is a shame because that movie was an excellent movie in it’s own right and has been an iconic movie for my generation. And still today the movie, E.T. has spawned references and toys and whole movie production companies that never would have existed otherwise… and, too where would Drew Barrymore be today without HER part in that movie? Too many movies have to kow-tow to that idea today. Only it is even worse for them. I am starting to thin that it would be much better if people stop seeing movies in order to “Look Cool” for the other kids instead of watching a movie just because it is a GOOD movie. We need to tell Hollywood that we want movies of substance that makes us better for having seen them. Movies like “Rudy”, “The Rookie”, “Fireproof”, “the Blind side” and so on. These are movies that have a message to them, they are mostly well made and they have a great theme to them. What’s more they are uplifting and encouraging and have a message to send. There ARE movies with harsher ratings that fit those criteria as well. I think that too many of them have had to do the same thing as Steven Spielberg, and so they add gratuitous words or violence that just try to capture a bigger audience, to me this is disappointing. These movies would be better served, I think, to have left the gratuity OUT. If they had then I would feel comfortable letting MY kids watch them, I might even sit down to watch them WITH my kids and then we would have an opportunity to bond. I think that is all I better say on the subject though it feels unfinished… maybe you can all help me finish this article by adding your thoughts on the subject and then we can have a dialog about it. In any event, Hope your day is a great one

who is the LOTR hero?

Here is a surprising revelation for all of you out there. And I have to open it to you through a question. Who is the hero of the Lord of the rings? Is it Frodo? The ring bearer the faithful one who doggedly goes on to try to destroy the one ring though it weighs heavily on his neck always tempting him? Is it Gandalf the powerful wizard who defeats a Balrog and becomes the head of his order (Of wizards)? Is it Gimli the stout and stalwart dwarf who realizes the errors of his prejudice towards Elves and becomes enlightened while still remaining a strong and ferocious fighter? Is it Legolas? Elegant and refined. Willowy and strong in his way while still looking suave and debonair and being a REALLY good shooter of arrows? Is it Merry and Pippin, the comic relief who in the middle of all this show the strength and capability to be strong? Maybe it is Aragorn the gold that does not glitter the strong silent type who will be there for you in thick and in thin. He will be the truest of the true and is descended from kings and heir to a throne. How about Boromir. The one that in the end realized the error of his ways and repented giving his life in defense of those who were in need. Actually I say we ought to look at the Hobbit that seems the easiest to forget about. Sam! Do you realize that without sam the ring would have never been destroyed? In his own way Sam has all the important attributes of the others (Stalwart, faithful, brave, loyal) while covering them all in the most forgettable and humble of exteriors. It is Sam who stays by Frodo’s side even when all others are gone. It is Sam who carries on when all seems lost, it is Sam who gives Frodo and the others the mental boost that allows them to carry on when all seems lost. In short, it is Sam who does all that is needed when everyone who looks at him can’t see his true worth. And yet when Frodo brings that up Sam discounts it’s value because he humbly, honestly, believes that he is doing only that which he was designed for and so he does not deserve the kudos. Much like some people I know. And in the end when Even Frodo finally succumbs to the power of the ring, Sam is the one who pushes for the mission to be completed and when all heck breaks loose Sam is the one who is there to pick up the pieces. Honestly ALL of them are heroes. They all sought out the needs of the many. Even Gollum has his moments. But I think that Sam is the most unsung of them. One of the things I really liked about the LOTR story line is that when Tolkien wrote it he made the characters REAL. Even though they may look or sound special and awesome they all are very real.

Awards or Fakes?

Recently a couple of issues came up… well really it was one issue that presented itself to me in two different ways. The first issue was about the men who went to Vietnam who were treated poorly and the men today who make claim to awards they did not really receive. The first cue was actually from my mom. She commented about how the numbers do not add up. 2,700,000 + men served In country in Vietnam, 1,700,000 of those men came home. Yet over 9 million people CLAIM that they received legitimate awards for combat in Vietnam. The second cue was an episode of the TV show “JAG”. In this show a character who is running for senate claims to not only have been a Navy Seal but to have won awards, in Vietnam, that he did not. The character claimed that he wanted to run on a platform of “Integrity in government and Values in the home.” But obviously there can not be any integrity or values when you are lying about who, or what, you are. Now fictional shows aside, the truth is that there are a lot of people out there who will present themselves as something other than what they were/are. They also run in all walks of life. I remember my mom once telling me, as an assistant scoutmaster in charge of advancement in the troop where I served, that I ought to make sure… that I owed it to myself AND to those kids to make sure that they really deserved the awards or promotions they were up for. She told me that I should not make it easier for them. This is something that they need to earn. The only way it means something is if it is something truly earned. So now thinking back on those guys who served in “’Nam” they worked hard, they were there and some of them went through a very real version of Hell. When they came home they were treated badly, many of them committed suicide because the stress of returning home to a country that, at best, didn’t care or worse went out of its way to belittle them, to treat them like criminals. So now, as a new generation is coming up, as we see the results of wars like Desert storm, Desert Shield, Operation Iraqi Freedom and so on. We tend to be supportive of our troops and suddenly it is O.K. even Noble to have served or to currently serve. And now that it is o.k. we also seem to see a lot of scum, yes I said it and I mean it, S-C-U-M!! who want to trample those men for personal gain. Some of them are politicians, some of them are just “regular joes” but everyone that lies about this casts shadows on the Real sacrifice those men made. So back to that show I think they said it well… A S.E.A.L. confronted that candidate, and he knocked out his lights. Later in the courtroom, while being tried for assault, the S.E.A.L. Said… “I’m a Navy SEAL. A direct descendant of the scout and raider units that invaded North Africa in 1942, A child of the underwater demolition teams that stormed the beaches of Normandy, I humbly follow those who cleared the way for landings on Pacific islands whose names are synonymous with words like courage, honor, country and death. My predecessors spilled their blood in the snow of Korea, and the rice paddies of Vietnam. No Navy S.E.AL. has ever surrendered or left behind a dead or wounded comrade. That is bravery and selflessness. That represents an ideal, as embodied by this uniform and insignia. To me this uniform is not just made of cloth. And the insignia is not just made of metal. No they represent the flesh and blood of all those who came before.” And Admiral Chegwidden said, “I killed men under the rules of war, that’s something I gotta live with every day. It’s made me appreciate the value of human life and the rules that guide it.” Again fictional plots aside, I agree with the sentiments that they expressed. I have served, and I have seen friends go to war. I have NOT gone to war and I will not claim to have done so. But that sense of pride in the uniform, the history and valor that has been performed in uniforms just like that give meaning to the uniforms worn today. And for anyone to disparage the deeds done by others just so they can look good… well that is just plain wrong. I think we all need to honor the men AND women who have served and who have earned the awards that go on their uniforms. If the awards were truly earned they mean A LOT. We ought to leave those awards for those who have paid the penalties and debts that go with having them on their chest/s. Because those penalties/ debts are great. Some of us may never know what it takes to watch your buddy who you slept next to ate with and laughed with taking a bullet next to you. Some of us might. They have kept us safe, they have served us in ways that we may never know. They have done that which many of us are not willing to do. And still we have people here today who will spurn them who will spit on them. And the others steal from them. We need to stop this practice. Oh and while you are at it, go out and find one of those who DID serve. We all know someone! And give them a hug.

I blame Taco Bell!

I have an issue, it is an odd issue to say the least. My Issue is that every time I hear the word supreme, I think of sour cream. And then I get hungry... And I blame Taco Bell for that. It can get very frustrating,I hear people talking about the recent ruling of the Supreme Court and I see a bunch of judges standing in a building covered with Sour cream. They talk about the Supreme intelligence and I think "Why did s/he put sour cream on their brain?" And do NOT get me started on when people talk about supreme beings. And I blame it all on Taco Bell because when I was growing up I always knew you had tacos with meat, cheese and lettuce; then you had tacos supreme which have all the things tacos have but you add sour cream and tomatoes. The same with Nachos/nachos supreme and burritos vs burritos supreme. So apparently, like Pavlov's dogs, I have been trained to think of adding sour cream (and tomatoes now that I think of it)to whatever else is mentioned. Of course I have to say that I am also disappointed because they used to put green onions and black olives on some of their items and they don't do that anymore... But that is a different issue.

The pros and cons of Ebooks.

Well here we are again. I want to talk today about the virtues and issues of Ebooks like the Nook and the Kindle. First let me consider the pros. (1) You can carry LOTS of books all in one place. If you are going on vacation or an avid reader this is AWESOME! If you are not such an avid reader… well that’s not so important. On the other hand you can also subscribe to blogs, magazines and newspapers with your device. Which leads me to the next plus… (2) You can easily get another book. You do not have to go to the library or the bookstore, you can just go online, find a book and have it delivered to your device, without even getting out of your bathrobe. (Some people find this to be a con though since their trips to the library or bookstore is the only outing time they get.) (3) There are things that you can add or include in your “Ebook” which enhance the experience. You can have the device “read the book” to you, play music while you read or you can install games to play for the times you need a distraction but do not feel up to reading. However there are cons to the whole genre too. (1) For example, like all electronic stuff an Ebook is open to bugs. They can freeze up or run out of battery power or short out or be easily damaged if they are banged around to hard. A real book will “survive” certain things like that much more easily. (2) Again due to their being electronic devices they can be temperamental. They require specific temperature ranges and even certain weather issues can negatively influence them, worse than a regular book would be affected. (3) This is a biggie I think, COST. You buy a regular book and that is all the expense. You buy an Ebook and you still have to go out and buy the “books” to store and read on the device. Personally I think that it would be best if the sellers of the Ebooks would add a “free” amount of downloads. (If you buy this device we will throw in 10 books of your choice free of charge.) That way it feels like you are getting your money’s worth. Oddly enough there is actually another con, one that I think was unintentional and, perhaps, unforeseeable And that is the “encouragement the Ebook would give to people to write books who have absolutely NO business doing so. I have purchased a Kindle from Amazon; actually I bought it at Target. And partly due to the cost issue already mentioned, I have found that the books I am inclined to load (free or at least really cheap) are, … well poorly written. There is no system where the books are vetted for issues like spelling or anything. So when I am reading along and all of a sudden come across a word that makes no sense… well I get really upset sometimes. I suppose it is almost as bad as people like me who use to many of those triple dot things. No really, it is kind of like when I was a boy of about 12; I was reading a book I got from the school library. I remember there was a word in that book I didn’t know; Pubic, but since I never heard of that word I simply substituted another word I DID know public which seemed to me to fit only it didn’t, what the heck is a PUBLIC hair??? But fortunately because the word was spelled correctly I was able to say “wait PUBLIC hair doesn’t make sense… there is no L in this word, let me look up PUBIC and see what it means. Then after all that I was able to say AH HAH!!! And I learned something new. The problem here is that the person making the mistake, adding letters or leaving them out, are the WRITERS so how then would a boy like me have figured that out? See I think part of the problem is that these “writers” are counting on spell check to catch their mistakes. The thing is that spell check does not care about context. For example think of the nursery rhyme, Mary had a little lamb, It’s fleece was white as snow, And everywhere that Mary went The lamb was sure to go. That is how it goes! Yet I could type instead… Merry hat a lid dell lam Its fleas was wide as no And every ware that Merry wend The lam was sure two go. Ok so I wrote all that WITH spell check on. Both passed muster, but the two “poems” are totally different. In fact the second one makes absolutely NO sense whatsoever. It is just a bunch of words strung together. They may sound the same as the first one they may be understood the same IF READ OUT LOUD but to read them you could get lost pretty quick. That is a large part of the problem with the authors I have been seeing lately. Worse maybe, some of the classic books I have received in my Kindle show similar degradation of spelling. Also some of the books I have read, the author/s have apparently HEARD a phrase or quote but never SEEN the quote. So they keep substituting what they THOUGHT they heard for the idiom wanted. So I guess what they need to do is get an idea of what life is really like and get a dictionary. Example “Nip it in the Bud!” I am pretty sure that the phrase I just wrote is the correct way to do it. Having gone out and seen the buds of leaves or flowers in the spring. And having put the quote in context (stop it before it really gets started). Then I can put together in my mind the idea that if you want to keep a flower from blooming or a tree from putting out a leaf then you NIP the branch/flower while it is IN THE BUD. Thus you will achieve the goal of stopping the process before it gets started. However what does NIP IT IN THE BUT do? Do you mean nip it in the butt? And what exactly does gently biting (a.k.a. nipping) someone on his or her hindquarters do to stop a process before it gets started? It doesn’t make sense. And of course Homophones are a big trap for these writers. I am going two the market where I will get too apples… oh and a pear to. HUH?????? It seems they forget that some words SOUND the same while being spelled (Spelt?) differently and that difference totally makes a difference! In a horror story am I going to be afraid of the wicked which? No but if it was a witch… oh yeah! Is it nice to have sunny whether? Um I do not think so but if the WEATHER is sunny I would like that a lot. And what is rack and ruin? When someone destroys a department store? Although WRACK and ruin… yeah that makes sense. How about, Reek or wreak? Peek or peak? Time or thyme? Accept or except? Leek or leak? Knight or night? Bite or byte? Red or read? Plain or plane? And then there are the times when spelling just doesn’t seem to matter. It is ok to put it in as long as it is a close approximation and the word doesn’t kick up a spell check error. (Lick instead of Like? Really?) Anyway those are the issues I have found with “Ebooks” and those are the reasons why I think it would be a good idea to keep a hold of your paper backs (or even Hardbacks) for a while yet to come.

The way we are taxed

Just wanted to point out the way our taxes seem to work these days. Found this and thought it was a good example...


Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:




The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.



The fifth would pay $1.



The sixth would pay $3.



The seventh would pay $7.



The eighth would pay $12.



The ninth would pay $18.



The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all such good customers", he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20". Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his "fair share?"

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:




The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).



The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).



The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).



The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).



The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).



The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got $10!" "Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!" "That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!" "Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!" The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

Thank you for reading.

Is hindsight really 20 20?

I really have to ask this question. I was thinking of an old aphorism, “for the lack of a nail, the shoe was lost. For the lack of the shoe the horse was lost, for the lack of the horse the army was lost. For the lack of the army the battle was lost, for the lack of the battle the war was lost. For the lack of the war the country was lost.”

It seems that we like to claim that “hindsight is 20-20. But is it really? Can we say with certainty what it is that works/worked and what didn’t?
We like to think so, but I wonder. I mean think about it. We claim that if such and such did (OR didn’t) happen then this is the way things would have turned out. We think we are right and we might actually BE right, most of the time. But are we always right?
Oddly this question came up because I was splaying Risk. I was doing this on my Gameboy and I reached a point where I was ready to do a turn in for troops. I was also ready to make my final move and crush my opponent.
I thought I had enough troops to finish the job without the turn in and didn’t want to waste the time or effort to do my turn in. but I chose to do so anyway.
It turned out that in hindsight I was probably right to avoid the turn in. at least that was the way it looked. I finished the game with the entire turn in worth of forces and a small percentage of other force left over.
I first thought “see what did I say”. But then I started thinking about it. In order to win I had to split my existing troops in half. And one half of those troops were destroyed in the eastern part of North America. The “bonus” troops I had received from my turn in were actually instrumental in capturing North America, because they were able to come in from the west and smash what was left after the main army half that was there was defeated. The half I lost had blunted my opponent’s force to where the back up could finish the job.
What if the back up hadn’t been there? The other half of my force could also have been overwhelmed. Just because I had a large section of troops leftover at the end does not mean that I would have had the percentage that I ended with if the “bonus” troops hadn’t existed.
In hindsight I was thinking I was right I didn’t need those troops. But in reality I may very well have needed them.
So even in hindsight there is a question as to whether they were needed or not. But I guess in the final analysis I have to turn to another saying…
“Better to have had them and not needed them, then to not have them and need them.”

Are kids today Selfish?

I sometimes have to cringe when I hear people of my parent’s generation say “kids these days are so selfish.” I mean really? Are you really going there?
I mean think about it. Your generation was the one whose mottoes were things like “sex drugs and rock and roll.” Or “if it feels good do it.”
These expressions define the very nature of selfishness. It is like saying “don’t worry about the consequences full speed ahead.
Do drugs! they feel good and so we should just do it. Never mind how many people they kill, never mind the way they cause dependence and cause people to become parasites on society.
Or how about Sex feels good so go out there and do it. Have no thought for the fact that you can easily spread S.T.D.’s and the whole era of permissiveness introduced new levels of S.T.D.’s previously unknown. (Can you say AIDS? How about HIV?).
The generation that wishes to pass judgement on “kids these days” is the same one that brought all this to being.
And I am afraid that many of them have yet to grow up. They refused to take part in a war, Vietnam, which I can understand, but despised their peers who did, which I cannot understand.

When the soldiers came back from war those who refused to do their part reviled them. In fact some of the ones who didn’t go would spit at the returning soldiers.

Some of the soldiers were in Vietnam against their wishes but they had a job to do. They were not given a choice but because they had honor or they felt a duty they still did what they were told to do by a government that needed them.
To spit at those who served and punish them, even though many of them were forced to do it; How is that mature? How is that unselfish? All you are thinking of in that moment is how YOU feel and that is selfishness.
If you do not want to fight, if you do not want to serve that is your prerogative. However it is NOT appropriate to cast scorn on people who believe differently than you JUST BECAUSE THEY DO NOT BELIEVE THE SAME WAY.
Some people believe in honor, some people believe in duty that does not mean you can target them for abuse. In fact some day you will depend on them to stand in the way of people who have no honor. You will expect these young men and women to protect you and keep you alive. Let me reiterate… you WILL NEED them to stand between an enemy and you. And it is the very attributes that you scorn them for that will cause them to do so.
So if you want to put down my generation or the next, well this is a free country, and I suppose that it is easier to be mean to someone than it is to try to lift them up. But do not expect me to have much sympathy for you when it comes back home to roost.